Get PDF Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11 file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11 book. Happy reading Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11 Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11 at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11 Pocket Guide.
About This Item
Contents:
  1. Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11
  2. Ancient Commentators on Aristotle project - Wikipedia
  3. Programa de Meditación en Colegios

Philoponus: Against Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9-11

By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. Log In Sign Up. Philoponus Against Proclus on the Eternity of the World James Wilberding. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.

Accompa- ic nying notes provide further details. First, in chapter 13, Philoponus is concerned to explain the composi- tion of the heaven and its manner of movement.

Some background is helpful here. Both Plato and Aristotle described the universe as a series ic of concentric elemental spheres, with earth at the centre and the em heavens rotating in a circle at the periphery. Moreover, these are not Ac merely the only elements in the universe; Plato seems to say something te y stronger, namely that everything in the universe i.

This is because in order to sb tri be visible a thing must contain fire, and in order to be tangible it must is m contain earth, and in order for earth and fire to be co-present in the td oo same body, water and air are required to mediate between them. And 2 why are sublunar beings constantly being de- stroyed and going out of existence, while superlunar bodies are apparently free of such destruction?

The upward and downward motions of the elements, and con- sequently the rough division of the universe into four concentric spheres, is due to a pre-cosmic shaking that causes the large and dense material to go toward the centre of the universe and rare and light material to go to the periphery. Although in general it is true that whatever is generated is also liable to destruc- tion,8 the Timaeus distinguishes between those things that are made directly by the Demiurge, i.

His primary argument for this conclu- Ac sion is that for each simple motion there naturally corresponds a simple body, and since circular motion is simple, there must be a simple body te y that naturally moves in a circle. In GC Aristotle sb tri defines each of the four sublunar elements in terms of two sets of is m td contrary qualities — the hot and cold, and the moist and dry: fire is hot oo and dry, air is hot and moist, water is cold and moist, and earth is cold no Bl and dry. It is rather beyond all contrariety and consequently beyond generation and destruction.

Ancient Commentators on Aristotle project - Wikipedia

The attitude of later Platonists on this issue is complicated. He concludes that even though intellective thinking proceeds sequentially, the sequence in question is not strictly speaking temporal. Philoponus then goes on to argue that the creative intellect is no exception to this rule, even though its thinking proceeds in a non-dis- cursive manner. The crucial premise of his argument here is that the creator must know the product of His act of creation, and he supports this premise with both textual and philosophical evidence.

With this premise in hand, since God is the creator of order and in particular of the order of the heavenly bodies, Philoponus can conclude: He knew it moving [and] for this reason He necessarily knew when each revolution returned to the same point — that is to say: First, He knew that the sphere of fixed stars returned; second, that the moon returned; third, the sun; fourth, the star of Jupiter, and the rest in turn.


  1. Against Proclus 'On the Eternity of the World ' - John Philoponus - Bok () | Bokus!
  2. A Guide to Polymeric Geomembranes: A Practical Approach (Wiley Series in Polymer Science).
  3. Unfurl Those Colors: McClellan, Sumner, and the Second Army Corps in the Antietam Campaign.
  4. Vickers Viscount and Vanguard!
  5. Download Philoponus: Against Proclus On The Eternity Of The World 9 11 2010.

The exam- ple illustrates that God engages in a kind of quasi-temporal sequential ic thinking just as discursive, created intellects do, and here again the em sequence is found to be not strictly speaking temporal. To give only a couple of examples, in chapter 14 we find a detailed investigation into the proper under- te y standing of the pre-cosmic state of disorderly motion.

Each of these features is hard to reconcile with other statements in the Timaeus.

Programa de Meditación en Colegios

Visibility is a problem because at Tim. Moreover, any kind of motion — even disorderly motion — in the pre-cosmic state is problematic because Plato at least in the Laws believes that soul is the source of motion27 and the World-Soul is likewise produced by the creator during the ordering of the universe. The alternative interpretation he offers is that it is bodies, i.

One might raise objections against this interpretation as well — in particular that this interpretation blurs the distinction between the pre-ordered and the ordered states by attributing forms to both. Rather, the point is entirely that there must is m td be some ontological intermediate which is generated but immortal to oo mediate between the ungenerated and immortal creator and the gener- no Bl ated and mortal creatures.

But that is to say that He wills each particular thing to exist when it is necessary and natural that it come to be. There are two principal questions here: why does Plato in some passages denigrate myth? And why does he nevertheless seem to employ myths as a philosophical tool in other passages? Concerning the former question, Philoponus delivers a shocking verdict. Therefore, the work of wicked Ac daimons introduced poetic myths into our lives in order to destroy mankind, and since Plato knew precisely this he banished these te y myths from his own city.

As a case in point Philoponus points to Timaeus 40DC3: But concerning the other daimons, to talk and know about their generation is too great a task for us. Yet, one must believe those who have discoursed about this before us since they are offspring of the gods, as they say, and they no doubt have clear knowledge of their ancestors. Philoponus then goes one step further and explains why Plato would include mythological dogma to which he does not subscribe: Plato frequently used myths, either in order to pay lip-service to the inherited custom […] or because he was wary of the danger stemming from the masses […] lest he also [i.

Departures from this text are marked with angle brackets and have been collected in a list at the front of the translation. Regarding almost all of the terms discussed by Share in his introduction to chapters I have independently made the same decisions as he. Likewise, to pan raises some difficulties.

Table of contents

In these instances, I translate accordingly. I would like to thank Sylvia Berryman and a number of anonymous vetters who each read and made valuable suggestions on part of the translation, the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle Project editorial ic team, and in particular Richard Sorabji. Special thanks for support and em encouragement should go to Ian Mueller who read and commented on ad an early draft of the entire translation.

Ac te Notes y bu ur 1.